Filming incentives criticised as unpopular short-term benefits in the US
Tax experts in the US have criticised the value of filming incentives and say that state authorities are increasingly disillusioned. They argue that local economic benefits are short-term and that US communities are tired of being used as doubles for elsewhere in the country.
Cara Griffith is with State Tax Notes and spoke to NBC News: “I think states are realising that [filming tax credits] are not worth the cost. The reality is that most states have not seen a corresponding increase in jobs created or dollars of revenue brought into the state.”
I think states are realising that [filming tax credits] are not worth the cost.
Cara Griffith, State Tax Notes
The US has had a tricky relationship with filming incentives and tax credits over the past few years as most state authorities have set aside money to attract Hollywood during tough economic times. Conflicting figures reported by partisan organisations haven’t helped.
Views of filming tax credits tend to fall down party lines – conservatives tend to oppose attracting liberal Hollywood – but the benefits of some productions are difficult to argue against. New Mexico paid nearly USD25 million in tax credits to host Marvel’s The Avengers, but the film spent around US90 million locally during the lengthy shoot.
Related Posts
- State Support: America’s love/hate relationship with filming incentives
- From DePalma to Spielberg: Filming with Location Manager Dow Griffith
- Spy game: Filming on location in Manila for The Bourne Legacy
- High-end TV: How the small screen became big business
- Adam Sandler’s new Netflix comedy Sandy Wexler filming in Griffith Park
- Will Smith films sci-fi epic After Earth on location in US and Central America
- TLG scouts Iceland with Dark Knight Rises and Bourne Location Managers
- Michigan – new film incentive package signed
Related posts:
Comments
Not Logged in
You must be logged in to post a comment
There are no comments